Standish Mellon Asset Management
May 02, 2017
Specialist multi-asset investment management firm

Will A Stick Fight Lead To Bigger Battles

From a small regional jet descending toward Vancouver International Airport, global trade looks vigorous. Out the left windows, passengers see huge bulk freighters riding at anchor in the harbor, waiting their turns to load Canadian raw materials destined for mills and construction sites in Asia. Out the opposite windows, vast rafts of logs harvested in the province’s interior fastness bob in the muddy water of the Fraser River awaiting shipment to the US and elsewhere. Between these waters, new construction pushes against the urban rainforest of Stanley Park with giant cranes swinging to and fro like alchemists’ wands turning Asian capital into skyscrapers. In the distance, farmland stretches out south and east like a vast patchwork quilt across the invisible line demarcating Canada from the US.


But though this corner of Canada has grown rich over the past two decades by exporting natural resources while importing human and financial capital, the future of that prosperity looks less certain for reasons that may have implications far beyond western Canada. The US Department of Commerce just recently announced a duty on Canadian softwood lumber imports ranging as high as 24%, with most Canadian lumber producers paying 19.88%. The move echoes the US lumber industry’s claim that Canada subsidizes its lumber exports. The decision also indicates that protectionist sentiment in Washington, DC has shifted from the realm of rhetoric into the realm of action on specific policies, even those pertaining to the nation’s largest trading partner.

But though this corner of Canada
has grown rich over the past two
decades by exporting natural resources
while importing human and financial
capital, the future of that prosperity
looks less certain for reasons that
may have implications far beyond
western Canada. The US Department
of Commerce just recently announced
a duty on Canadian softwood lumber
imports ranging as high as 24%, with
most Canadian lumber producers
paying 19.88%. The move echoes the
US lumber industry’s claim that Canada
subsidizes its lumber exports. The
decision also indicates that protectionist
sentiment in Washington, DC has
shifted from the realm of rhetoric into
the realm of action on specific policies,
even those pertaining to the nation’s
largest trading partner.
Sovereign analyst Nick Tocchio says the
imposition of the duty on Canadian
lumber risks souring the broader
trade relationship between the US and
Canada, while also providing a glimpse
of how the Trump administration may
approach future trade disputes. “This
bottom-up, industry-by-industry
approach could be the way they go
forward, rather than applying a top-
down approach with actions such as a
border adjustment tax or a complete
overhaul of NAFTA.”
Softwood lumber appears to provide
a convenient opportunity for an
administration looking to test an
ad hoc approach to protectionism.
While NAFTA ostensibly liberalized
trade between the US and Canada in
1994, the US maintained restrictions
on imports of Canadian lumber until
October 2015; hence, this new duty is
less disruptive than a similar measure
would be for other industries such as
energy or automotive where many
companies have complex cross-border
operations. The lumber industry also
has a long history of disputes between
the US and Canada; and while British
Columbia has previously been able to
prove to NAFTA tribunals that it is not
guilty of subsidizing lumber exports, the
appeal process is lengthy.
The new tariffs imposed by the US
will most significantly impact British
Columbia, which produces about half
of Canadian softwood lumber and
whose lumber industry supports around
60,000 jobs.
From a small regional jet
descending toward Vancouver
International Airport, global
trade looks vigorous. Out the left
windows, passengers see huge bulk
freighters riding at anchor in the
harbor, waiting their turns to load
Canadian raw materials destined
for mills and construction sites in
Asia. Out the opposite windows,
vast rafts of logs harvested in the
province’s interior fastness bob in
the muddy water of the Fraser River
awaiting shipment to the US and
elsewhere. Between these waters,
new construction pushes against
the urban rainforest of Stanley Park
with giant cranes swinging to and
fro like alchemists’ wands turning
Asian capital into skyscrapers. In
the distance, farmland stretches out
south and east like a vast patchwork
quilt across the invisible line
demarcating Canada from the US.
Will A Stick Fight Lead To Bigger Battles?
The comments provided herein are a general market overview and do not constitute investment advice, are not predictive of any future market performance, are not provided as
a sales or advertising communication, and do not represent an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Similarly, this information is not intended to provide
specific advice, recommendations or projected returns of any particular product of Standish Mellon Asset Management Company LLC (Standish). These views are current as of
the date of this communication and are subject to rapid change as economic and market conditions dictate. Though these views may be informed by information from publicly
available sources that we believe to be accurate, we can make no representation as to the accuracy of such sources nor the completeness of such information. Please contact
Standish for current information about our views of the economy and the markets. Portfolio composition is subject to change, and past performance is no indication of future
performance.
BNY Mellon is one of the world’s leading asset management organizations, encompassing BNY Mellon’s affiliated investment management firms, wealth management services
and global distribution companies. BNY Mellon is the corporate brand for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Standish is a registered investment adviser and BNY Mellon
subsidiary. WP/5-1-17/BR
As Tocchio observes: “The Bank of
Canada is already very cautious about
trade uncertainty, so they won’t have to
refresh their stance following this news.
But this confirms that they are right to be
wary. Developments such as this might
suggest why firms are hesitant to make
significant investments in Canada when
there is so much uncertainty around
trade policy. This supports our view that
the Bank of Canada will keep monetary
policy on hold into 2018.”
Beyond Canada, though, the larger
concern for investors is whether the
new duty represents merely the latest
sniping in an ongoing regional conflict
or the first shot in a new trade war to
be waged by a more protectionist US
administration.
SHARE OF CANADA’S TOTAL EXPORTS BY INDUSTRY
Energy products &
natural resources
Motor vehicles
and parts
Softwood
lumber
22.10%
15.20%
1.70%
Source: Bloomberg as of April 28, 2017
get_app  Login to Download this PDF
More from Standish Mellon Asset Management