Segall Bryant & Hamill
August 09, 2022
Segall Bryant & Hamill leverages its proprietary investment research, deep industry experience and long‐tenured team to provide intelligently constructed portfolio solutions.

Thoughts on the Current Environment 3Q22

3Q 2022 Newsletter

From Ralph Segall, Chief Investment Officer

“If you do not change direction, you might end up where you are heading.”

—Lao Tzu (Chinese Philosopher, ca 6th century BC)

One of the key reasons that common stocks typically comprise the largest portion of our client portfolios is that they provide direct participation in the growth of the global economy. As the economy grows, corporate profits increase, and strong companies are able to both invest in opportunities for new growth and share with their owners (i.e., shareholders) the fruits of their efforts through increased dividends and stock buybacks. As an aside, it’s significant that roughly 40% to 50% 1  of the 9% annualized return stocks have provided over the last 100 years has come from dividends paid out—a factoid that might seem strange to investors accustomed to receiving a dividend yield these days around 1% to 2%.

This is the primary reason we believe in fundamental, bottom-up research as the basis for constructing equity portfolios. While we evaluate numerous financial metrics for each company we research, Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) is the one metric that has proven to be, based on experience, a strong indicator of a company’s long-term return. Historical data shows that the companies that produce the highest ROIC have delivered the best returns for investors over time. Said succinctly, high ROIC companies tend to be the wealth creators in society. 2  Tracking the progress of companies, identifying which are seeing changing dynamics that will cause the ROIC they generate to inflect higher—or, crucially, lower—and doing it well has shown to be a fruitful approach to stock selection.

We begin this essay with the restatement of our bedrock principles of equity investing as they are our true north, particularly during turbulent financial markets like those we find ourselves navigating today. The “science” of portfolio construction may lie in the analysis we do on individual securities, but the “art” of the effort is to determine the appropriate valuation to put on the companies we are considering. Volatility across markets is often the result of a regime change in monetary or fiscal policy, leading to the reconsideration of value across financial assets. Individual investors find this volatility to be very unsettling. As professional investors, we find that volatility creates and uncovers investment opportunities on which we can capitalize. We do so by adhering to our bedrock principles and investment discipline.

In the last edition of  Thoughts on the Current Environment , we laid out our case for thinking such a regime change was underway. The lack of restraint by the central banks of the world, chief among them being the Federal Reserve system here in the U.S. (Fed), to print money at an excessive rate has finally encountered a countervailing force: inflation. The rapid rise of inflationary pressure, first thought to be pandemic-related and temporary, seems more durable and has finally caused policy makers to change their profligate ways. As far as financial assets are concerned, we argued that the prices of stocks and bonds had risen to valuation levels that could not be justified without assuming that prices, however unanchored to the realities of economics, could just keep on rising indefinitely. As a result of reduced monetary stimulus, or perhaps alongside of it, economic (and thus profit) growth is moving to a lower trajectory. As we stated, slower population growth around the world, and smaller gains in productivity are likely to keep profit margins under pressure. Rising interest rates that result from Fed tightening will also cut into corporate profits.

 

We also suggested that the affairs of the day—the war in Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, new variants of COVID, unconstrained increases in inflation, political turmoil in much of the world—were all factors that could accelerate or delay the arrival of the new financial asset order. As it happens, they have hastened the revaluation of financial assets, as the returns in the second quarter very amply demonstrate. In this construct, whether we are at “peak inflation” or not is really not an issue. Profit growth is likely to be subdued for the intermediate term, whether that growth slows quickly or in a more gradual fashion. Similarly, debate over whether the markets of the last two or three years represent a “super-bubble” or not will be of more interest to economic historians than to us. That profits may be much weaker than current forecasts suggest is not a consensus, this despite warnings by companies such as Target and Microsoft. As you know, we don’t pay much attention to consensus anyway, often using it as a counter signal to our own actions.

We remain in the mindset that this is a time to protect capital rather than to aggressively seek to grow it. Does protecting capital mean engaging in wholesale selling of stocks (or bonds, for that matter)? In short, we think not. It does mean understanding that trying to find a bottom by bargain hunting in some of the asset categories that have been hit the hardest is not necessarily the right action either. Below is a table of the casualties of the onset of the bear market (measured from the market’s peak on January 4 of this year). Perhaps a trigger warning is required for those who quail at the sight of big losses in value.

 

An End of a Speculative Era: Regime Change Imposes Reality into Valuations

December 2021 – June 2022

Source: FactSet. The values are indexed to 12/31/2021. This means that the price on 12/31/2021 is 100 and any deviation from there is shown in each chart. Data for the Meme stocks is based on ETF ticker MEME-US. Data for SPACs is represented by ETF ticker SPAK-US. The BTC Index is the price of Bitcoin indexed to 100 at 12/31/2021. ARKK is an ETF that (by its own definition) invests in “cutting-edge firms” that adhere to the advisor’s definition of “disruptive innovation”. In other words, we view these as high growth, speculative securities. The strong cash flow portfolio is represented by ETF ticker COWZ-US, which focuses on companies that have strong, positive free cash flows.  Past performance is not an indicator of future results.

 

Whether these companies will recoup these losses in value does not turn on the amount of loss they have sustained to date. That would assume the earlier peak valuations had been warranted by the underlying economics, as opposed to the enthusiasm of buyers with too much time, money, and speculative fever on their hands.

In time, inflation will abate. As the old maxim says, “The best cure for high prices is high prices.” Prices, after all, are a signal. They tell producers to bring more of what they sell to market, and they also influence buyers to consider cutting back or finding alternatives. It is instructive to note that for many commodities that have active futures markets, the prices several years forward are substantially lower than current (“spot”) prices today. Prices today reflect immediate shortages here and now. Such problems usually get fixed in fairly short order.

And in due course, interest rates will stabilize. How much higher and when is beyond the abilities of any forecaster, including your correspondent, to predict. Long-term interest rates tend to anchor in and around long-term real growth rates plus a premium for long-term inflation rates. As we think that global growth is in for a period of slow real growth, any fear of returning to the double-digit interest rates of the 1980s is likely misplaced.

The combination of stability in the economy and of interest rates levels will allow stock market participants to get back to estimating how much of a premium over interest rates they think they are due for the risk of investing in stocks. Which will bring us back to the place this essay began: Which stocks should an investor buy? And why? That is where we focus vast amounts of time, energy, and effort. If we keep doing what we have done for the last 27 years on behalf of our clients, we believe they should find their capital relatively well protected compared to the broad market and ready to resume compounding again, when that time comes.

 

 

O
ne of the key reasons that common stocks
typically comprise the largest portion of our
client portfolios is that they provide direct
participation in the growth of the global economy.
As the economy grows, corporate profits increase,
and strong companies are able to both invest in
opportunities for new growth and share with their
owners (i.e., shareholders) the fruits of their efforts
through increased dividends and stock buybacks. As an
aside, it’s significant that roughly 40% to 50%
1
of the 9%
annualized return stocks have provided over the last
100 years has come from dividends paid out—a factoid
that might seem strange to investors accustomed to
receiving a dividend yield these days around 1% to 2%.
This is the primary reason we believe in fundamental,
bottom-up research as the basis for constructing equity
portfolios. While we evaluate numerous financial
metrics for each company we research, Return on
Invested Capital (ROIC) is the one metric that has
proven to be, based on experience, a strong indicator
of a company’s long-term return. Historical data shows
that the companies that produce the highest ROIC
have delivered the best returns for investors over
time. Said succinctly, high ROIC companies tend to be
the wealth creators in society.
2
Tracking the progress
of companies, identifying which are seeing changing
dynamics that will cause the ROIC they generate to
inflect higher—or, crucially, lower—and doing it well
has shown to be a fruitful approach to stock selection.
SBH NEWSLETTER
3
RD
QUARTER 2022
SEGALL BRYANT & HAMILL
3RD QUARTER 2022
1
“If you do not change
direction, you might
end up where you
are heading.”
—Lao Tzu (Chinese Philosopher,
ca 6th century BC)
Ralph M. Segall
, CFA, CIC
Chairman, Investment Policy Committee;
Chief Investment Officer
Thoughts on the Current Environment
And Regime Change Gets Underway
1
Source: Strategas Research Group.
2
ROIC is the amount of money a company makes that is above the average cost it pays for its debt and equity capital. A higher ROIC can be considered an
indication that Company A can generate more profit for a given investment than Company B, which has a lower ROIC.
We begin this essay with the restatement of our bedrock
principles of equity investing as they are our true north,
particularly during turbulent financial markets like
those we find ourselves navigating today. The “science”
of portfolio construction may lie in the analysis we do
on individual securities, but the “art” of the effort is
to determine the appropriate valuation to put on the
companies we are considering. Volatility across markets is
often the result of a regime change in monetary or fiscal
policy, leading to the reconsideration of value across
financial assets. Individual investors find this volatility to
be very unsettling. As professional investors, we find that
volatility creates and uncovers investment opportunities
on which we can capitalize. We do so by adhering to
our bedrock principles and investment discipline.
In the last edition of
Thoughts on the Current Environment
,
we laid out our case for thinking such a regime change
was underway. The lack of restraint by the central banks
of the world, chief among them being the Federal Reserve
system here in the U.S. (Fed), to print money at an
excessive rate has finally encountered a countervailing
force: inflation. The rapid rise of inflationary pressure,
first thought to be pandemic-related and temporary,
seems more durable and has finally caused policymakers
to change their profligate ways. As far as financial assets
are concerned, we argued that the prices of stocks
and bonds had risen to valuation levels that could not
be justified without assuming that prices, however
unanchored to the realities of economics, could just keep
on rising indefinitely. As a result of reduced monetary
stimulus, or perhaps alongside of it, economic (and
thus profit) growth is moving to a lower trajectory. As
we stated, slower population growth around the world,
and smaller gains in productivity are likely to keep profit
margins under pressure. Rising interest rates that result
from Fed tightening will also cut into corporate profits.
We also suggested that the affairs of the day—the war in
Ukraine, supply chain disruptions, new variants of COVID,
unconstrained increases in inflation, political turmoil in
much of the world—were all factors that could accelerate
or delay the arrival of the new financial asset order. As it
happens, they have hastened the revaluation of financial
assets, as the returns in the second quarter very amply
demonstrate. In this construct, whether we are at “peak
inflation” or not is really not an issue. Profit growth is
likely to be subdued for the intermediate term, whether
that growth slows quickly or in a more gradual fashion.
Similarly, debate over whether the markets of the last
two or three years represent a “super-bubble” or not will
be of more interest to economic historians than to us.
That profits may be much weaker than current forecasts
suggest is not a consensus, this despite warnings by
companies such as Target and Microsoft. As you know,
we don’t pay much attention to consensus anyway,
often using it as a counter signal to our own actions.
We remain in the mindset that this is a time to protect
capital rather than to aggressively seek to grow it. Does
protecting capital mean engaging in wholesale selling of
stocks (or bonds, for that matter)? In short, we think not.
It does mean understanding that trying to find a bottom
by bargain hunting in some of the asset categories
that have been hit the hardest is not necessarily the
right action either. The table on the following page
shows the casualties of the onset of the bear market
(measured from the market’s peak on January 4 of
this year). Perhaps a trigger warning is required for
those who quail at the sight of big losses in value.
SEGALL BRYANT & HAMILL
3RD QUARTER 2022
2
As professional investors, we find that
volatility creates and uncovers investment
opportunities on which we can capitalize.
Whether these companies will recoup these losses in
value does not turn on the amount of loss they have
sustained to date. That would assume the earlier peak
valuations had been warranted by the underlying
economics, as opposed to the enthusiasm of buyers
with too much time, money, and speculative fever
on their hands.
In time, inflation will abate. As the old maxim says,
“The best cure for high prices is high prices.” Prices,
after all, are a signal. They tell producers to bring more
of what they sell to market, and they also influence
buyers to consider cutting back or finding alternatives.
It is instructive to note that for many commodities that
have active futures markets, the prices several years
forward are substantially lower than current (“spot”)
prices today. Prices today reflect immediate shortages
here and now. Such problems usually get fixed in fairly
short order.
And in due course, interest rates will stabilize. How much
higher and when is beyond the abilities of any forecaster,
including your correspondent, to predict. Long-term
interest rates tend to anchor in and around long-term
real growth rates plus a premium for long-term inflation
rates. As we think that global growth is in for a period of
slow real growth, any fear of returning to the double-digit
interest rates of the 1980s is likely misplaced.
SEGALL BRYANT & HAMILL
3RD QUARTER 2022
3
An End of a Speculative Era: Regime Change Imposes Reality into Valuations
December 2021 – June 2022
Source: FactSet. The values are indexed to 12/31/2021. This means that the price on 12/31/2021 is 100 and any deviation from there is shown in each chart.
Data for the Meme stocks is based on ETF ticker MEME-US. Data for SPACs is represented by ETF ticker SPAK-US. The BTC Index is the price of Bitcoin indexed to
100 at 12/31/2021. ARKK is an ETF that (by its own definition) invests in “cutting-edge firms” that adhere to the advisor’s definition of “disruptive innovation”.
In other words, we view these as high growth, speculative securities. The strong cash flow portfolio is represented by ETF ticker COWZ-US, which focuses on
companies that have strong, positive free cash flows.
Past performance is not an indicator of future results.
SEGALL BRYANT & HAMILL
3RD QUARTER 2022
4
July 1, 2021
3Q21
4Q21
1Q22
2Q22
June 30, 2022
Low
High
Dow Jones
Industrial Average
®
34,633.53
30,775.43
29,888.78
36,799.65
S&P 500
®
Index
4,319.94
3,785.38
3,666.77
4,796.56
Russell 3000
®
Index
2,583.20
2,183.43
2,113.70
2,804.93
Russell 2000
®
Index
2,329.36
1,707.99
1,649.84
2,442.74
Russell Midcap
®
Growth Index
1,825.48
1,276.87
1,213.98
1,987.87
Bloomberg US
Aggregate Bond Index
2,352.59
2,111.40
2,057.31
2,385.81
Bloomberg Municipal
Bond Index
1,352.25
1,236.15
1,214.34
1,364.36
Gold (Price/Oz)
London AM Fix
1,774.00
1,813.60
1,729.55
2,017.15
S&P-GSCI
Commodity Index
2,619.85
3,768.02
2,416.90
4,294.66
Market Barometers
As of 6/30/22
Source: Bloomberg.
This information has been prepared solely for informational purposes and is not intended to provide or should not be relied upon for investment, accounting,
legal, or tax advice. The factual statements herein have been taken from sources we believe to be reliable, but such statements are made without any
representation as to accuracy or completeness. These materials are subject to change, completion, or amendment from time to time without notice, and Segall
Bryant & Hamill is not under any obligation to keep you advised of such changes. This document and its contents are proprietary to Segall Bryant & Hamill,
and no part of this document or its subject matter should be reproduced, disseminated, or disclosed without the written consent of Segall Bryant & Hamill.
Any unauthorized use is prohibited.
Investing in securities can result in loss of capital. Clients with different investment objectives, allocation targets,
tax considerations, brokers, account sizes, historical basis in the applicable securities or other considerations will typically be subject to differing
investment allocation decisions, including the timing of purchases and sales of specific securities, all of which cause clients to achieve different
investment returns. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.
We want to acknowledge Michael Chilla of our Quantitative Research team for his help in the preparation of this edition
of our Thoughts on the Current Environment newsletter.
For more information, please reach out to us at contactus@sbhic.com.
The combination of stability in the economy and of
interest rates levels will allow stock market participants
to get back to estimating how much of a premium
over interest rates they think they are due for the risk
of investing in stocks. Which will bring us back to the
place this essay began: Which stocks should an investor
buy? And why? That is where we focus vast amounts
of time, energy, and effort. If we keep doing what we
have done for the last 27 years on behalf of our clients,
we believe they should find their capital relatively well
protected compared to the broad market and ready to
resume compounding again, when that time comes.
Next