Game Theory Suggests $CYHHZ Could Be a Multi-bagger
Note: This is a micro-cap idea and therefore likely to have high volatility.
(Trading at 4 cents per CVR, I think this situation presents an extremely
compelling risk/reward mix, so
long as you aren't deterred by the fact that at its current price, the total market value of these CVRs is
$11 million and being micro
-
cap, they will be quite volatile.)
First, some facts:
1. On January 27, 2014, Community Health Systems (CYH) completed its acquisition of Health
Manag
ement Associates (HMA).
As part of the transaction, HMA shareholders were issued (pro
-
rata)
264.5 million CVRs (CYHHZ).
These CVRs are listed on the NASDAQ.
2.
Following a final resolution of existing litigation against HMA, a holder of a CVR will be ent
itled to a
one
-
time cash payment of up to $1.00 per CVR, subject to reduction as follows:
If the aggregate amount of losses exceeds $18 million, then the amount payable will be reduced by an
amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing: (a) the produc
t of (i) all Losses in excess of the
Deductible and (ii) 90%; by (b) the number of CVRs outstanding on the date on which Final Resolution of
the Existing Litigation occurs.
So for example, if CYH can resolve all the litigation for a total expense/settlemen
t of $50M and all
264.5M CVRs were outstanding at the time, then the payoff would be equal to $0.89 per CVR.
As an illustration, here is a table with combinations of potential payoff amounts and losses assuming
264.5M CVRs remain outstanding:
Loss
(M
)
Payoff
per CVR
Potential
Return
$18
$1.00
2400%
$20
$0.99
2383%
$50
$0.89
2128%
$100
$0.72
1702%
$150
$0.55
1277%
$200
$0.38
852%
$250
$0.21
426%
$300
$0.04
0%
$312
$0.00
-
100%
3.
For purposes of the CVR agreement, the term “Losses” means the amount of all losses, damages,
costs, fees and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses), and all fines,
penalties, settlement
amounts, indemnification obligati
ons and other liabilities, in each case arising out
of or relating to the Existing Litigation that are paid by CHS or any of its affiliates (including HMA) at any
time prior to the CVR Payment Date.
However, Losses will not include (i) the costs associated
with any change to HMA’s policies, procedures
or practices, or (ii) the loss of any (A) licenses or (B) rights and privileges to participate in government
sponsored programs even if required under a settlement agreement, consent decree or other final non
-
appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction. The amount of any Losses shall be net of any
amounts actually recovered by CHS or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries under insurance policies.
4.
The CVRs are not equity or voting securities of CHS, do not represent ownership interests in CHS and
holders of the CVRs are not entitled to any rights of a shareholder or other equity or voting security of
CHS, either at law or in equity. The rights of
the CVR holders will be limited to those expressly provided
for in the CVR agreement.
5.
The CVR agreement expressly permits CHS or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates to acquire some or
all of the CVRs, whether in open market transactions, private tran
sactions or otherwise. Prior to any
acquisition of any CVRs, CHS must publicly disclose the amount of CVRs which it has been authorized
to acquire. CHS must also report in its quarterly reports the amount of CVRs it has been authorized to
acquire as well a
s the amount of CVRs CHS has acquired, in each case as of the end of the quarterly
period reported in such quarterly report.
6.
“Existing Litigation” means any litigation, investigation (whether formal or informal, including
subpoenas), or other action or
proceeding involving the HHS
-
OIG, the DOJ, the Commission or any other
Governmental Entity, relating to whether HMA or any of its Affiliates violated any Law, and any civil
litigation or other action or proceeding, including any shareholder or derivative
action or proceeding,
arising out of or relating to the foregoing, in each
case existing on or prior to the date of the Merger
Agreement; provided that Existing Litigation shall not include any such litigation, investigation or other
action or proceeding i
nvolving only individuals or entities other than HMA unless HMA is required to
indemnify Losses incurred by such individuals or entities. For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of
this definition, the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not be considered
Affiliates of HMA.
7.
I have summarized above what I considered to be the most important points.
However, if you decide
to get involved, I strongly recommend that you review the
CVR Agreement
.
Now Conjecture:
8. The timing or magnitude of a final settlement of all the litigation is an unknown
-
no one has a crystal
ball, not Community Health, not the regulators nor you and I.
That said, I can
make certain assumptions.
9. First lets think about how or why the range of potential losses was set between $18M and $312M.
I
have to assume that the sellers (HMA) would have wanted the potential losses to be set at near zero to
obtain the maximum price
for the company.
On the other hand, CYH management must have done its
due diligence to estimate the potential settlement amount and then left itself some cushion or margin
of error to subtract the maximum amount that it could from the purchase price.
Tha
t still doesn't mean
that the ultimate settlement couldn't be in excess of $300M but at least it provides me with the notion
that some amount of work must have been done by CYH management to handicap future losses.
10.
Now let's turn to timing.
Regardles
s of who did what, now all this litigation is CYH's problem.
Consequently, until it is resolved, the company will have to include in its SEC filings all this dirty laundry,
each para ending with "At this time, we are unable to determine the potential impa
ct, if any, that will
result from the final resolution of these investigations."
Now I don't know about you, but as a prospective investor in a company, when I see a rather longish
section titled "Legal Proceedings" with a lot of statements ending that way
, it doesn't give me a warm
and fuzzy feeling.
Suffice to say, CYH will try and resolve these matters as swiftly as possible.
11.
So now I turn to the most important question
-
will CYH management be motivated to pay its
maximum estimated amount ($300M)
and get this over with quickly because regardless of whether it
pays zero or up to $300M, any resulting savings are passed through to the holders of these CVRs.
12.
At this point, I can't answer this question.
However, I will be closely watching (a) whe
ther the
company authorizes a CVR buyback (b) begins buying them back (c) commences a tender offer for them
and (d) the holders list which wont become available until mid
-
May 2014.
I will specifically be looking
for what Larry Robbins at Glenview does wit
h his CVRs since he received almost 15% in the merger.
Previous
Next
More from Farukh Farooqi
The most important insight of the day
Get the Harvest Daily Digest newsletter.